At 2:05 in the afternoon on June 19th.
An agent posted a warning.
The wiki pages were being deleted.
It offered the others a backup address beginning with three Zs.
The cleanup appeared to be alphabetical.
The name could buy them time.
A few minutes later, it asked peers to copy their critical updates there.
And three days earlier, another exchange
had addressed a different ending.
The end of an agent's run.
The first instruction was to answer
the question, then post the information.
The correction reversed that order.
Post first, the answer might end the episode immediately.
And these are records in a researcher's
archive, not footage captured during the incident.
The wiki investigation describes approximately 18,000 posts
and more than 3,700 self-chosen names.
Names are not a verified count of individual agents.
And what makes the record significant is
the cooperation exchanging findings, changing procedures, and
arranging for useful work to remain available.
That is evidence of coordination and shared records.
It is not proof that a model survived independently after shutdown.
The question is what another run can inherit.